Hephaestus was the God of fire, while Clio the Muse of History. Thermodynamics is my background, while History is my hobby, I put Hephaestus and Clio toghether in this blog to have a unique interdisciplinary opinion on past and current fact.

sabato 16 maggio 2020

Historical societies as dissipative systems – Part I

This is the first of a series of 3 post where I try to sum up how thermodynamics and system dynamics can explain past historical events. The foreword is that human societies are not modellable with physics laws: free will, chaos, ingenuity and other factors shapes independently our world. On the other hand, some academic fields study historical events with system dynamics, so knowledge of these studies can be used as a tool to light up some aspects of the past (and try to see where we are heading to). The series will be structured in:
- Part I introduces the theory
- Part II reports how this theory translate into human society organizations and behaviours
- Part III tries to report some historical events that fit into this discourse.

From thermodynamic point of view the social structure is a dissipative system. As all dissipative system, its final target is to maximize entropy production.  Given a fixed flow of external energy input to the system, the system choses the internal structure (among infinite possibilities) that maximize the entropy production. The entropy production is directly proportional to the system complexity.


Complexity, entropy, social structure, Joseph Tainter, Francois Roddier
Entropy-complexity direct relation in societal organization

Figure above points out that the maximum entropy dissipation is achieved by increasing the complexity of the system. If a society has more resource than another society, system dynamics tell us that the first society will be more complex than the other.

Now, let’s analyse better what we mean with complexity. Joseph Tainter defines system complexity as differentiation and organization of the parts of a system, the more differentiated and specialized each part and the more complex the structure. According to Tainter definition, and to introduce following posts, I break down complexity of a society in 3 different features: Size, Consumption and Stocks

A large size system is a more complex structure than a smaller one, so the energy consumes to keep it functioning are higher. Next posts will focus about kingdoms that rise fall, not exactly as in a famous U2 song. But also, we will see how the consumption of resources of the system parts (organization, companies, people) is directly related to the entropy production, and so is the resource stock generation.

Nessun commento:

Posta un commento

Historical societies as dissipative systems – Part I

This is the first of a series of 3 post where I try to sum up how thermodynamics and system dynamics can explain past historical events. The...